Approach
Strong design needs the right conditions.
Customer insight turned into product decisions, research that changes the outcome, shared standards people can actually use, and teams that keep getting better.
Start with the working reality
Understand the user’s task, context, and constraints. In clinical work, protective equipment changes the interaction. In shopping, readiness to buy changes what the cart should do — which is why Save for Later sat beside checkout at Home Depot rather than replacing it. Those details shape the right decision.
NAVICA: designing for clinical reality ↗Make the reasoning visible
Connect evidence to a specific choice. Compare alternatives, explain the trade-off, and let the next iteration respond to what was learned. For Sephora × JCPenney, two compared flows made the grouping decision obvious and gave my product and engineering partners a shared basis for it.
Sephora: from flow comparison to design decision ↗Build capability around the work
Give people standards they can use, support they can reach, and time to adapt. A shared design system across 15 Abbott country sites cut design and development debt by 30%; 40+ practice guides at Wayfair made methods usable beyond a single conversation. Hiring, coaching and governance determine how consistently a team can deliver.
Wayfair: the operating conditions for design ↗Keep human judgment present
Design AI-supported interactions with attention to explainability, recovery, and human accountability. Make the system understandable and preserve people’s ability to make informed choices.
Auro Prism: the evolving research ↗